Lenz Grimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Nelson Marques wrote:
>
> > I have this little problem:
> > I installed the 2.2.0 kernel in a Suse6 installation, but it runs
> > kernel 2.0.36 instead, WHY??????
>
> Make sure, that you use the correct install path for lilo and the
> Makefile. By default, the kernel will be installed as /vmlinuz, while LILO
> is looking for /boot/vmlinuz. Either correct /etc/lilo.conf or the
> variable INSTALL_PATH in /usr/src/linux/Makefile
>
> > And why doesn't the gcc compiler compile 2.2.2 kernel sources??
> > Procedure:
> > make menuconfig
> > make dep
> > make clean
> > make bzImage
> > make modules
> > make modules_install
>
> This seems to be a common problem with 2.2.2. I still run 2.2.1, though...
>
> Bye,
> LenZ
Hi Lenz,
uname -a
Linux wdm 2.2.2 #1 SMP Tue Feb 23 18:57:27 AKST 1999 i586 unknown
Been up with Linux-2.2.2 since it came out. Worked great for me.
No problems at all.
Regards
-Dee
W.D.McKinney (Dee) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Faith is acting on your passions & beliefs.
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
