I would like to apologize for stirring the water here.
 I never meant for RedHat or anyone else to get
slammed.  I was stupidly voicing my opinion before
doing my homework...I know it takes time for things to
change.  Thanks for pointin me to the site Donnie.  I
hope this list can return to it's normal topic. 
Perhaps this thread would be best put to sleep.  
Sorry again guys...Can't we all just get along ;)

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> > >> on things like directory structures, library
> locations, etc. .  
> >  
> > > http://www.linuxbase.org
> > 
> > You must be joking, Donnie. Any perusal of the
> specs available at
> > linuxbase.org will show that almost nothing is
> actually on 'paper'.
> > 
> > Nowhere can I find or do I hear of any evidence
> that points to a
> > really active LBP committee.
> 
> Why don't you join the mailing lists and see for
> yourself.  I'm there
> and I post.  SuSE folks are there and they post. 
> Same with lots of
> others.
> 
> > Even if the committee were active and even if
> agreement could be
> > reached soon are the distro's really going to
> implement this
> > blueprint.
> 
> If agreement is reached, yes, I believe folks will
> implement it.  You
> are more than skeptical, though, which isn't really
> fair.
> 
> > If they all do agree unanimously to implement what
> is the timetable.
> 
> Unsure.  What is the timetable on *any* open source
> project?  I've
> never seen one for the kernel, XFree86, or anything.
>  This is yet another
> one.
> 
> > Nowhere, from none of the parties concerned, do I
> get any indication
> > of the urgency of this project or real commitment
> to it. 
> 
> Then scream at your vendor, not me.
> 
> > I hope I am wrong but I think that the (hidden)
> interests of all parties
> > concerned are not moving in the direction of a LB.
> And that is not good.
> 
> That's certainly one opinion.  I do not share it,
> however.
> 
> This group is led by the same person who leads the
> FHS.  It has been
> very successful.  I have no reason to believe the
> LSB won't be at 
> least that successful, if not more.  These things
> don't happen overnight,
> however.  If you want it to move faster then *join*
> in and get some
> things done.  That's how this open source thing
> works.  Don't bitch
> at me because your timetables aren't being met.
> 
> 
> --Donnie
> 
> --
>    Donnie Barnes    http://www.redhat.com/~djb   
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   "Bah."
>    Challenge Diversity.  Ignore People.  Live Life. 
> Use Linux.  879. V. 
>                 The more you cry, the less you'll
> pee.
> 
> 
> --
> To get out of this list, please send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
> Check out the SuSE-FAQ at
> http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
> archive at
>
http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
> 

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html

Reply via email to