On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
> I wonder why Linux isn't "branded". Is it because Linux fails some technical
> conformance criterion or is it because no one wants to put up the money to get the
> brand?
Here are three URLs concerning the Unix98 question:
http://lwn.net/lwn/980611/standardseditorial.html
http://lwn.net/980604/
http://www.UNIX-systems.org/market_information/may29.html
They should give you a picture of what this is about. ;-)
---J.T.U.
#include <disclaimer.h> \\|// - ?
(o o)
/================================oOOO=(_)=OOOo=====================\
| Jon Trygve Utne |e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Department of Informatics | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| University of Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| NORWAY | |
| Tlf: |"Smith & Wesson: The original|
| Home: +47 55 13 06 13 | point and click interface" |
| Work: +47 55 58 40 39 | |
| URL: http://www.ii.uib.no/~jont | |
| .oooO |
| ( ) Oooo. |
\==================================\ (==( )======================/
\_) ) /
(_/
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
