Ewan Dunbar wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Fred A. Miller wrote: > > > > > This is DEAD wrong in a lot of areas...but, you should read it. > Where? I haven't found any problems with it. WAY better than that WSJ > article. Yes, I fail to see where it is dead wrong... especially in a "lot" of areas. Please explain. Karsten Johansson ______________________________________________________ Get your free web-based email at http://www.xoom.com SPECIAL OFFER: 250 Web Site Templates, Only $29.95! - http://orders.xoom.com/email -- To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
- [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked in OS study Fred A. Miller
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked in O... Ewan Dunbar
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked ... Michael Johnson
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked in O... Karsten Johansson
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked ... Michael Merritt
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knoc... Steven T. Hatton
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knoc... Paul Hostetler
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knoc... lunaslide
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked ... Larry Yates
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked in O... Karsten Johansson
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knocked ... Greg Thomas
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux knoc... Steven T. Hatton
- Re: [SuSE Linux] CNET News.com - Linux ... Ewan Dunbar
