Karsten Johansson wrote:
>
> Ewan Dunbar wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This is DEAD wrong in a lot of areas...but, you should read it.
> > Where? I haven't found any problems with it. WAY better than that WSJ
> > article.
>
> Yes, I fail to see where it is dead wrong... especially in a "lot" of
> areas. Please explain.
Well, take the paragraph:
"Missing from Linux are high-availability features that would let one
Linux server step in and take over if another failed; full-fledged
support for computers with multiple
processors; and a "journaling" file system that is necessary to quickly
reboot a crashed machine without having to laboriously reconstruct the
computer's system files, the study said."
Is Beowulf merely a figment of my imagination? As well as many other
clustering solutions. Try doing half of that with NT.
Also, my server does quite well using its dual processors -- I'm not
sure how much more support is needed to be "full-fledged?"
--
Michael Merritt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.merrittpop.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.merrittpop.com/jmm/
ICQ: 21021306
--
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
