On Monday 12 June 2006 00:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Ne 11-06-06 15:05:10, Jason Lunz wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > Fine for me. > > > > > > [Warning: some shells have "suspend" built in command, so specifing > > > exact path like ./suspend is more important than usual.] > > > > maybe it would be a good idea to call it "ususpend"? aliasing a shell > > builtin doesn't seem like a good idea to me. > > Well, I'd prefer to call it s2disk , if we do the rename... but rename > is not easy operation, and I'm not sure it is worth it?
I would do the rename since built-in suspend *will* confuse users (it confused me at first time even that I use linux for several years) and renaming is easier now than when suspend.sf.net stuff becomes more popular (like after 2.6.17 is released). > Pavel -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
