Hi, On Monday 12 June 2006 08:53, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Monday 12 June 2006 00:38, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Ne 11-06-06 15:05:10, Jason Lunz wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > > Fine for me. > > > > > > > > [Warning: some shells have "suspend" built in command, so specifing > > > > exact path like ./suspend is more important than usual.] > > > > > > maybe it would be a good idea to call it "ususpend"? aliasing a shell > > > builtin doesn't seem like a good idea to me. > > > > Well, I'd prefer to call it s2disk , if we do the rename... but rename > > is not easy operation, and I'm not sure it is worth it? > > I would do the rename since built-in suspend *will* confuse users (it > confused > me at first time even that I use linux for several years) and renaming is > easier now than when suspend.sf.net stuff becomes more popular (like after > 2.6.17 is released).
I tend to agree. It may be a problem for SUSE (suspend has been shipped in 10.1), but generally it's better not to confuse anyone. ;-) Stefan, would you agree with changing the name of "suspend" to "s2disk"? Rafael _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
