On Monday 16 October 2006 09:59, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:12:27AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Yeah, mainly because I have no time to learn autoconf. :-)
> >
> > Oh, so autoconf is ok for this project? (automake, too?). I'm asking
> > because some people do not like ac/am.
>
> I really hate it. 
Heh ;)

> At least for such small projects like this one, where 
> the configure script tends to blow up the tarball size by a factor of 2
> at least.
That's true . Fortunately I don't care about size of configure script if it 
does the thing and does it properly :)

> If we identify the features we really need from it, it should be easy to
> just put that into CONFIG_* in the Makefile
Nah, that's the thing I hate. Requiring some CONFIG_ crap if things can be 
autodetected (or forced as autoconf allows forcing, too).

CONFIG_ is sometimes ok for choosing features but large file support is not 
something that user should choose: if system support LFS then enable it.

> or into a small configure 
> script.
I hate such scripts because these do not work most of time in nonstandard 
enviroments; do not have standardized options; etc, etc. mplayer configure is 
a big example of such crappy script.

(there are tons of people who hate ac (am less) while some (like me) just use 
it when needed/useful ;)
-- 
Arkadiusz Miƛkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel

Reply via email to