On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > As far as the interruptible freeing is concerned, is it _really_ that > important? Currently the shrinking of memory is common code and I don't think > the interruptibility is a good enough reason to make things more complicated > than they have to be. At least not _now_.
Even if it was "my idea" to make it interruptible, i agree here :-)) > That would be tricky, because they are lost when the memory contents from > before the suspend are restored. To print them at the very end we'd have to > write them into the swap header, for example. But s2disk could wait for a keypress before powerdown (if debug mode is on). If i'm _not_ debugging a problem, the timings are not too interesting :-) -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
