On Monday, 6 November 2006 08:14, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > As far as the interruptible freeing is concerned, is it _really_ that > > important? Currently the shrinking of memory is common code and I don't > > think > > the interruptibility is a good enough reason to make things more complicated > > than they have to be. At least not _now_. > > Even if it was "my idea" to make it interruptible, i agree here :-)) > > > That would be tricky, because they are lost when the memory contents from > > before the suspend are restored. To print them at the very end we'd have to > > write them into the swap header, for example. > > But s2disk could wait for a keypress before powerdown (if debug mode is on). > If i'm _not_ debugging a problem, the timings are not too interesting :-)
Alternatively, resume can wait for a key after the times get printed. -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel