On Monday, 6 November 2006 08:14, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:46:37PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > As far as the interruptible freeing is concerned, is it _really_ that
> > important? Currently the shrinking of memory is common code and I don't
> > think
> > the interruptibility is a good enough reason to make things more complicated
> > than they have to be. At least not _now_.
>
> Even if it was "my idea" to make it interruptible, i agree here :-))
>
> > That would be tricky, because they are lost when the memory contents from
> > before the suspend are restored. To print them at the very end we'd have to
> > write them into the swap header, for example.
>
> But s2disk could wait for a keypress before powerdown (if debug mode is on).
> If i'm _not_ debugging a problem, the timings are not too interesting :-)
Alternatively, resume can wait for a key after the times get printed.
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
