On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:22:30 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 April 2007 22:06, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:18:46 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think we have to debug the swap-file-on-LVM case more thoroughly.
> >
> > OK, I've tried printing out /dev/resume_device + offset in mark_swap.
> > Does the following seem reasonable?
> >
> >
> > char ff[100];
> > lseek(fd, shift, SEEK_SET);
> > read(fd,ff,80);
> > printf("The header (shift %u): %80s\n", shift, ff);
>
> Yes, it does.
>
> > It prints nothing ...
>
> I thought it would.
>
> Still, swap-offset doesn't fail, so it evidently is able to find the swap
> signature in your file.
> Can you hack swap-offset.c so that it prints stat.st_rdev after calling
> fstat()
> and run it on your swap file, then hack suspend.c so that it prints blkdev
> in set_swap_file() and compare these two things?
stat.st_rdev == 0, but I think that's logical, because the swap _file_ is not a
device file.
stat.st_dev == 64773
Which is also the value of blkdev in suspend.
grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
