On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:22:30 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 April 2007 22:06, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:18:46 +0200 > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think we have to debug the swap-file-on-LVM case more thoroughly. > > > > OK, I've tried printing out /dev/resume_device + offset in mark_swap. > > Does the following seem reasonable? > > > > > > char ff[100]; > > lseek(fd, shift, SEEK_SET); > > read(fd,ff,80); > > printf("The header (shift %u): %80s\n", shift, ff); > > Yes, it does. > > > It prints nothing ... > > I thought it would. > > Still, swap-offset doesn't fail, so it evidently is able to find the swap > signature in your file. > Can you hack swap-offset.c so that it prints stat.st_rdev after calling > fstat() > and run it on your swap file, then hack suspend.c so that it prints blkdev > in set_swap_file() and compare these two things? stat.st_rdev == 0, but I think that's logical, because the swap _file_ is not a device file. stat.st_dev == 64773 Which is also the value of blkdev in suspend. grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel