On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:14:02PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > >> If you ask me... I think lzo will be better for most users... But I > > > > > >If you can argue lzo is significantly better, we can switch, but we do > > >not want both. > > > > Well... So let's switch. :) > > So, what are advantages of lzo? Is it significantly faster? Better > compression ratio? > > Stefan, do you like lzo?
I don't care, as long as it works :-) It seems more projects are using lzo than lzf, so (assuming we are using shared libraries), it might be better memory wise (but in fact it does not matter much, since both are so small). Judging from the propagana on theire websites, i'd guess that they don't differ too much in performance. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
