On Monday, 6 August 2007 00:05, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> 
> Well... It never worked :)

Why exactly do you think so?

> This what happens on shortcuts...
> Why calling this inside printf context instead of making this own statement?
> 
> ---
> 
> --- suspend.org/resume.c      2007-05-13 20:53:13.000000000 +0300
> +++ suspend.work/resume.c     2007-08-06 00:59:57.000000000 +0300
> @@ -377,10 +427,11 @@ static inline int load_image(struct swap
>  
>  static char * print_checksum(char * buf, unsigned char *checksum)
>  {
> +     char *_buf = buf;
>       int j;
>  
>       for (j = 0; j < 16; j++)
> -             buf += sprintf(buf, "%02hhx ", checksum[j]);
> +             _buf += sprintf(_buf, "%02hhx ", checksum[j]);
>  
>       return buf;
>  }
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Suspend-devel mailing list
> Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
> 
> 

-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel

Reply via email to