On Monday 06 August 2007 00:46:01 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 August 2007 00:05, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > > > Well... It never worked :) > > > > Why exactly do you think so? > > Because you increment buf and return it... This will not work with > printf() as it always be an empty string. ? Sorry, i also cannot see the problem you describe. The way print_checksum worked until now can be found very often (also e.g. inside the kernel) and it works just absolutely fine for me. Incrementing and returning buf (or any other non-constant function parameter, being just a kind of runtime-preset local variable) is nothing wrong, special or abnormal. And why should the sprintf always be/produce an empty string? It will always give you 16 characters (not including the terminating zero).
I really appreciate the effort you put into all this, but this special patch is more or less just a artificial pad out. Thanks, Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
