> "Have we a response for this problem ??. For sure, it«s the question of the > future of biofuels"
Aye. I agree with Pedro. The money will go to the most effective lobbying , more dedicated to nuclear means less for renewables research. Nuclear has had its chance, and share of the public treasury for decades. Time to shift to renewables. "Who cares"? On this point, at least, we should. And the response is clear. Don't let the $ go there. Ed B. www.biofuels.ca ----------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pedro M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <biofuel@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:53 AM Subject: [biofuel] Where direct the money > Where direct the money and the public resources, to nuclear-fossil energy or > to renowable biofuels ???. > > This is the kernel of the problem, in Europe ( Loyola de Palacio, > Comissioner of the EU), United States ( Bush Plan ), and so on. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "steve spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <biofuel@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:16 PM > Subject: Re: [biofuel] Nuclear > > > > who cares. this is not a anti nuclear forum. it's a biofuels forum. enough > > already. > > > > Steve Spence ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Small business owners... Tell us what you think! http://promo2.yahoo.com/sbin/Yahoo!_BusinessNewsletter/survey.cgi http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
