"If the containment was adequate why did the judge in the 3 mile Island case order reinforcement of the containment structure? The basis for the extra expense, and construction delay, was 3 Mile Island constituted an above average risk due to flight path and the power plant location. The court had expert testimony and access to engineering plans. It seems they didn't share your belief."
What phase of engineering was the judge qualified in? I'm afraid I don't have much respect for judicial interference in engineering matters. And my guess is that when the transcript is read, it will be found to require further STUDY and DOCUMENTATION of the containment structure's ability to withstand aircraft impact, not any actual change in the design. That was the case with Diablo Canyon's alleged vulnerability to earthquake. The antinuke crowd failed to stop construction permanently, but they did add to the cost of the project by generating delay and "study" to prove what should already be obvious. Marc de Piolenc ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> FREE COLLEGE MONEY CLICK HERE to search 600,000 scholarships! http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
