"goat industries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Yes, Dana, there are people interested in finding greener recipes for making
>biodiesel. They do seem to exist but are generally highly guarded industrial
>secrets. I got a bit disallusioned by the polluting effect of the basic
>methanol/lye method as it produces a lot of mirky water in the refining
>process which is a problem to serious biodiesel producers as the local
>environment agency (UK) is highly officious and very fond of imposing large
>fines on businesses that cause pollution. I am currently researching other
>methods.

Sounds like it's your highly officious local UK environment agency 
you should be getting a bit disillusioned with rather than the 
polluting effect of the method, which was discussed here a month or 
two ago and would seem to be more of a molehill than a mountain. Is 
it really worse than soapy residues etc from dishwasher, laundry 
detergents, bathwater? Aleks detailed the contents of the waste water 
(pretty innocuous) and said there's no need to be saintlier than the 
Pope. Keep 2nd and 3rd wash water for next-batch first wash; dilute 
first-wash water and offer it to your lawn - try a small patch first, 
but prolly neither lawn nor moles will mind, might even appreciate 
it. Nothing you don't find in fertiliser bags. You can find a helluva 
lot worse in fertiliser bags: 6.2 million pounds of lead compounds, 
1.3 million pounds of chromium compounds, 233,000 pounds of cadmium 
compounds, 212,000 pounds of nickel compounds, 16,000 pounds of 
mercury compounds and 223 pounds of arsenic compounds (dioxins not 
measured) supplied in US fertilizer bags in 2000. Plenty of real 
problems with water pollution in the UK to be concerned about.

"UK's polluted rivers named" - "WWF says the relevant government 
agencies do not have the money to monitor fresh water properly, and 
are often powerless to act even when they find problems."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1285000/1285883.stm

Should add this:

"Aerosol Pollution Could Drain Earth's Water Cycle", San Diego, 
California, December 7, 2001 (ENS) -- Pollution may be seriously 
weakening the Earth's water cycle, reducing rainfall and threatening 
fresh water supplies. A new study by researchers at the Scripps 
Institution of Oceanography suggests that tiny particles of soot and 
other pollutants are having a far greater effect on the planet's 
hydrological cycle than previously realized, directly affecting fresh 
water availability and quality. The aerosols are a mixture of 
sulfates, nitrates, organic particles, fly ash, and mineral dust, 
formed by fossil fuel combustion and burning of forests and other 
biomass.
http://ens-news.com/ens/dec2001/2001L-12-07-06.html

Using biodiesel gives substantial reductions of unburned hydrocarbons 
(-93%), carbon monoxide (-50%), and particulate matter (-30%), ie 
soot - NBB. So is using biodiesel rather than dinodiesel helping the 
water situation more or less than your washwater is polluting it, 
d'you think?

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
Handmade Projects
Tokyo
http://journeytoforever.org/

 


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WoOlbB/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/FGYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Please do NOT send "unsubscribe" messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to