--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Motie

Hi Keith,
> 
> If you're saying that it would have been better not to grow the 
stuff 
> in the first place, but since it's there you might as well burn it, 
> I'd much agree with you. Burn it direct, or as fuel ethanol (plus 
> DDG) or as oil for biod or SVO (plus seedcake).

That was/is my point exactly. We can't 'ungrow' it and recover the 
fuel already expended. We may as well find a use for it, rather than 
leave it to rot. If the farmers' intent was to grow a crop for 
Ethanol production, corn should not be his first choice.
> 

SNIP>

> > Tidwell also seems to be 
> not very clear about that. "It's cool to burn corn," he says, but 
> doesn't ask if it's cool to grow it. Not at all cool, except for 
ADM 
> maybe, at everyone else's expense. Maybe he hasn't heard of ADM 
yet. 
> So much for overnight activists.

Unfortunately, he seems to be representative of some of the more 
enlightened (less ignorant) people. Most don't seem to have 
progressed so far as activism, through ignorance and apathy. Those 
who are activists are sadly misinformed, which I see as even worse 
than uninformed.
> 
> Best
> 
> Keith
> 

Cheers,
Motie



Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://archive.nnytech.net/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to