The problem with that system would be ... who would be the "system administrator" of such a system???
The Admin would have almost Godlike powers .... since, being in charge of how votes are processes, would be able to make anyone he chooses ... "win" the elections. And then later, through the media .... ahem ...."explain" why the dude won. I don't think I like the idea of having one single person (or two or three guys) control "what the will of the people is". You think power is concentrated NOW ... you try wait until system administrator's got the power to elect or not elect at the "click of a mouse". Nope, not me, Curtis Computer Geek Get your free newsletter at http://www.ezinfocenter.com/3122155/NL ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wonder if anyone would like to make comment on the following... Direct Democracy Teledemocracy - E-Democracy .The teledemocracy movement seeks to reform government to include the voices of citizens in the policy making process. --------------------------------------------- Introducing NetZero Long Distance 1st month Free! Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
