http://biz.yahoo.com/rm/030828/environment_carbon_1.html
If the US succeeds in killing Kyoto, then whatever, but ultimately I'm going to continue suggesting that those nations who notice a clear trend toward warming and want a change in tune from the U.S., might want to pursue a partial strategy of WTO type penalties. Some folks only understand the languages of force and money. American Insurers, and others, faced with the prospects of massive penalties at home (if Global Warming does cause damage) and trade penalties to the overall economy from abroad, might change their tune. I don't understand all of Kyoto, but I haven't heard much about it as to penalties for non-compliers or non-signers. What about that? If one nation, through a sort of deliberate bet that global warming can't be the case, ends up being wrong and contributing disproporationately to the property damage worldwide, then shouldn't it pay for its bet? MM ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
