On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:49:39 +0900, you wrote: >Hello Arthur > >You lose! > >I suppose it's no big surprise that a thread such as this should hit >Godwin's Law, but it sure didn't take you long.
[...] > >Whether you agree with it or not, Luc provided some analysis and some >references and links, which you dismiss as "proven scams and hate >literature" and liken them to "Mein Kampf". It just doesn't work that >way here. We're all entitled to our opinions, and entitled to express >them too, but when you're attempting to discredit someone else's >view, which he's provided some substantiation for, it needs a little >more than just an opinion and a contemptuous slap-aside. So either >add some substance to it, or don't expect to be treated with any >respect. > I've read through a few of Luc's comments and found them worth some consideration. However, I haven't read much, in part because of this, from May 27: >Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:31:28 -0000 > >A Clean Break - Strategy for Securing the Realm. Pay attention to >the signatories. >http://www.irmep.org/Policy_Briefs/3_27_2003_Clean_Break_or_Dirty_War >.html >There's still more to it than that, but lest I be labelled >a "conspiracy nut" it shall remain as such :), but then I don't >really care who labels me with what so here goes anyway: >In conjunction with the above "Clean Break" document written by the >main instigators of the Iraq invasion we pony it up to another much >maligned document whose authenticity was declared "a forgery" by a >Swiss court, but then that judgement was overturned as >unsubstantiated but it is only the original denigration that is >publicised for obvious propaganda value; the document of course >is "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" outlining a world >control strategy whom some have "theorised" was actually originally >written by none other than Myer Amschtel Rothschild when he was >setting up his world banking empire. >http://www.usa-the-republic.com/illuminati/zion.html is where to go >read it. It would seem odd that a "forgery" (normally a copy of an >original) would hold information that is now common fact in the >world we live in. A coincidence? Does the sun rise everyday by >chance? As I am not a scholar on this document, but was more offended, as I said, by the manner in which the topic of the document was raised, I'd like to ask if anyone here has any response to this "analysis" of Luc's. If Luc is to be praised so mightily for raising topics that take some analysis and effort and (arguably) courage in the face of established arguments, then I wonder that there is *no comment* from the all-of-a-sudden too-busy gallery when he brings forth a statement such as the above. MM ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
