The pages you've given are opinion and conjecture. I won't argue that they're not the opinion and conjecture of the people who posted them. You just can't seem to get the point that the opinion and conjecture of the right is not proof of Moore lying. You offer pages that take one little point of a film, present it totally out of context and say that is proof of lies in the entire film. This is your way of trying to discredit the information in Farenheit 9/11. Which is exactly what you claim that those who are trying to open your eyes are doing.
Anyone who can point to perceived inconsistencies to try to discredit Moore in a Farenheit 9/11 thread, and then claim that others are trying to dicredit the source rather than address the issues must not think anyone on this list is very intelligent. Well, you're wrong. Those tactics may work on you, but won't on the majority of this list. You are not worth wasting any more of my time over. Unless you can post something that isn't doing exactly what you claim to be fighting against, I won't bother with you any longer. Brian --- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Randall Sanborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, the pages I gave you are very well founded and > documented. They are valid, and true. You know, its really funny, I > can't, off hand, think of anyone that has actually tried to discredit my > argument that Moore is a lier, and that his 'documentaries' are less > documentary than one-sided propaganda. The only counter-point I can > think of off hand is my comment about the number of casualties. I'll > leave that for now, thats more of a pro/anti-war argument. > > I really don't understand the force at which people are fighting for > Michael Moore either. I've certainly stated that I really have no > position to support the current administration. Rather I think everyone > is blindly accepting what this man is saying because he too doesn't like > Bush. The enemy of your enemy is your friend, sure, doesn't mean you > have to agree with him. > > Randall Sanborn > > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 19:29, Appal Energy wrote: > > > You moved so quickly to find error with the sources that you > > completely > > > disregarded the argument itself. > > > > Nah, nah, nah, nah homey. > > > > If the foundation is rotten the roof quickly collapses. Again, there > > is no > > valid argument than can be constructed on faulty data. You can try all > > you > > like, but all you'll end up doing is spending a lifetime shoring up > > walls > > and buttressing the ceilings to keep everything from caving in on you. > > > > Try firm ground for a change. It will save you and everyone boatloads > > of > > effort and grief. > > > > Happy Happy... > > > > Todd Swearingen ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
