Far beit for me to wizzle in your corn flakes, BUT, there is 
documented proof that the US government had contemplated the use of 
aircraft as bombs a long time ago.
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/shockedcloak6,3,02.htm

http://www.geraldplessner.com/articles/article.cgi?doc=20040422165204
4th paragraph.

While being informed of the second aircraft hitting the WTC Bush 
showed absolutely NO surprise or shock or anything, he just sat 
there. By then he, or at least the Secret Service, KNEW that 
aircraft were hijacked and were beginning to crash into buildings, 
so the Reganesque "I didn't know" ploy just doesn't hold water.

L.

--- In biofuel@yahoogroups.com, Hakan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Lillie,
> 
> Yes, it is a mystery for anyone with flight experience, even more 
that our 
> points are not on official investigation and records. It is 
absolutely 
> clear that they knew that the four planes were hijacked long 
before any of 
> them had hit anything. Hijacking is also something that should be 
reported 
> to the president immediately. Since it was no experiences about 
using 
> planes as projectiles, it is understandable that they could not 
predict 
> what was going to happen. However, to claim that the chain of 
awareness was 
> like it is officially described, must be either an enormous 
incompetence by 
> all involved, or attempts to hide something else, maybe hiding of 
the 
> presidents incompetence to give instructions.
> 
> Even for a normal hijacking, the fighters should have been 
shadowing the 
> planes within minutes after they changed course and have done so 
before. 
> Who says that this did not happen in this case and maybe the 45 
minutes are 
> a scam. This is standard procedures and here we have four break of 
the 
> procedures at the same time. I do not want to think about 
conspiracy in the 
> actual events, but for sure it must be conspiracy to save the 
presidents a-s.
> 
> Hakan
> 
> 
> At 18:24 04/07/2004, you wrote:
> >That's right Hakan. There is no doubt due to the flight 
regulations that 
> >ATC knew these were hijackings minutes after the aircraft changed 
course. 
> >One of the regulations specifies to transponder code 7500 (hijack 
code). 
> >Also, for a commercial airliner to change course without 
explanation 
> >spells a hijacking. They never, ever change course without ATC 
approval! 
> >These are instrument flight rules, the aircraft and ATC are in 
constant 
> >contact.
> >
> >The mystery then remains how long did it take for the information 
to reach 
> >the president, why were fighter jets scrambled 45 minutes after? 
Why did 
> >the president even play a lead role, jets should have been 
scrambled to 
> >receive instructions in flight. Washington DC has the most 
restricted 
> >airspace, yet penetration was allowed.
> >
> >I think the possibility that the US let this happen is quite HIGH 
but also 
> >the fat, lazy government bureaucrats have more blame than Bush 
but there 
> >is no responsibility there or anywhere in government, they all 
remain 
> >blameless.
> >
> >The movie is a good blessing if nothing more than to stir up the 
fat, lazy 
> >US citizens into questioning the behavior of their governments.
> >
> >Kerry will not bring any meaningful changes, no president can. 
It's time 
> >for revolt but that is unlikely since even the poor and homeless 
in the US 
> >are comfortable. We'll just have to sit back and watch the whole 
thing 
> >collapse under it's own weight.
> >
> >my 2 cents of opinion,
> >Lillie
> >
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Hakan Falk
> >   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> >   Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 6:11 AM
> >   Subject: Re: [biofuel] Re: THE HOT MOVIE
> >
> >
> >
> >   Greg,
> >
> >   You are right in general terms, but to claim that it would be 
possible 
> > that
> >   any of the planes could crash where they crashed, because of 
any health
> >   problem, is still an impossibility. I have been sitting in the 
front seat
> >   and have a pilot license, even if it is for small planes. Had 
my own plane
> >   for 5 years, a Cessna 177 Cardinal, fully equipped. My PPL is 
history now,
> >   since I lost my right eye and will not pass medical or be able 
to do PFT.
> >
> >   Remember that the crash sites are far away from where air 
liners were
> >   supposed to be and only that will immediately tell you that it 
could 
> > not be
> >   accidents. Air liners are flying under controlled conditions 
in assigned
> >   airways and are not allowed to leave them under almost any 
condition and
> >   certainly not without permission. All the planes in 911 were 
so far away
> >   from the airways, that it must have been deliberate and could 
not be
> >   accidents of any kind. So already the first plane that crashed 
into the
> >   twin tower, told the air control that it was a deliberate 
attack.
> >
> >   I have a night rating and the second time after I got it, I 
was going from
> >   Falun in Sweden to Bromma airport during night. In my flight 
plan, I was
> >   flying under non controlled condition and would pass 1 km 
outside the
> >   control zone of Arlanda airport , instead I got 300 m inside 
and on about
> >   20 km distance from the airport. I was immediately contacted 
on the radio
> >   about my mistake and when I landed at Bromma I was met by the 
control
> >   authority, to receive a reprimand and warning. I do not like 
to tell this
> >   story, because I know that we have more pilots on this list 
and they know
> >   how stupid I was. Both Manhattan and Pentagon are well inside 
control 
> > zones
> >   and the planes must also have been well observed long before 
they hit the
> >   targets. I cannot understand why the president should have 
been told that
> >   the first plane that went into WTC, could have been an 
accident.
> >
> >   The public is not told the whole truth of what was going on, 
but if there
> >   were policies in place and resources in the air, the planes 
could have 
> > been
> >   shot down long before they hit the targets. As I been reading 
about it, 
> > all
> >   the planes flow for 10 to 20 minutes, after they left the air 
way, and
> >   could be determined to be a threat. I am surprised that the 
president were
> >   not advice of a potential situation, before it happened, and 
maybe we have
> >   an even greater story here. Also remember that they went down 
to low
> >   altitude and continued at that altitude.
> >
> >   You are not really fair in your judgement, if you have the 
experience that
> >   you claim. It could not have been accidents and everybody 
involved knew
> >   that from the first crash, the president must have been 
informed of it
> >   already then or even before the crash.
> >
> >   Hakan
> >
> >
> >
> >   At 03:15 04/07/2004, you wrote:
> >   >My point was, much like it was in my first post, he like many 
others in
> >   >this nation thought at first it was an accident, but, you 
read in my post
> >   >only what you wanted to read.
> >   >
> >   >It is true you do not know anything about aircraft, because 
actually, a
> >   >pilot having a heart attack, could very well cause an 
aircraft to crash.
> >   >
> >   >Have you ever sat in the front seat, and flown an aircraft?   
I have, and
> >   >I know it is possible.
> >   >
> >   >I also had a friend that died that way. The pilot had a heart 
attack, and
> >   >slumped over the controls, putting the plane into a dive, and 
the 
> > copilot,
> >   >couldn't fight the weight of the pilot on the control stick, 
and they
> >   >ended up going in -- not one survivor.  It was a closed 
casket funeral 
> > for
> >   >my friend. SO DON'T TELL ME IT CAN'T HAPPEN, IT HAS!   So has 
other
> >   >aircraft have crashed through history, because the pilot, has 
loss
> >   >consciousness for one reason or another.
> >   >
> >   >Only an incompetent idiot would say that a heart attack can't 
cause an
> >   >aircraft to crash, and only an incompetent idiot would ever 
joke about
> >   >something as tragic as 9/11, like you did.
> >   >
> >   >Tell me, your being so smart, what do you think that Bush 
should have 
> > done
> >   >in the 7 minutes that your complaining about, with little to 
no
> >   >information?  Do you think that every time something happens 
he should 
> > run
> >   >for Air Force One?  Just for your information, from when he 
was at, even
> >   >if he left right away, it would have taken longer than 7 min, 
just to
> >   >reach AFO.  You would begrudge Bush, if it took 30 seconds 
for him to do
> >   >something.  Your hindsight is just as good as the rest of us, 
your
> >   >foresight is the same as well, or you wouldn't have permitted 
9/11 to
> >   >happen in the first place.
> >   >
> >   >You are nothing but an armchair quarterback, calling out the 
what might
> >   >be's, what could have been's, and what he should have done's 
from the
> >   >sidelines, without ever having been in the other persons 
shoes, and 
> > saying
> >   >the entire time give me something to hold water.
> >   >
> >   >Greg H.
> >   >
> >   >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   >   From: Brian
> >   >   To: biofuel@yahoogroups.com
> >   >   Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 16:29
> >   >   Subject: [biofuel] Re: THE HOT MOVIE
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >   I'm confused.  Were you trying to prove that Bush did 
nothing while
> >   >   the country was under attack?  That seems to be the point 
of the
> >   >   stuff you posted.
> >   >
> >   >   Also, being a former pilot, Bush would have known that 
there is a co-
> >   >   pilot and enough safeguards in a commercial airliner that 
a pilot
> >   >   having a heart attack wouldn't result in a plane crashing 
into a
> >   >   building.  I know nothing about planes, and I know that.
> >   >
> >   >   Again, do you have any arguments that will hold water 
which would
> >   >   show that Bush is anything but an incompetent idiot?
> >   >
> >   >   Brian




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/FGYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Biofuels list archives:
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/

Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address.
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/biofuel/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to