http://enn.com/news/wire-stories/2002/04/04252002/ap_47032.asp
- 4/25/2002 - ENN.com
Senate fattens energy bill with tax incentives for conservation, 
alternative fuels

Thursday, April 25, 2002

By H. Josef Hebert, Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Senate is on track to finish energy legislation this 
week after agreeing on $14 billion in energy tax breaks and staving 
off attempts to scuttle an agreement that would require ethanol in 
gasoline.

Among a series of last-minute additions to the bill was a proposal, 
approved Wednesday, aimed at promoting the use of combined heat and 
power facilities to produce electricity. The measure, sponsored by 
Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., was approved unanimously after an attempt to 
kill it was defeated 60-37. These facilities are attractive to 
environmentalists because they use energy more efficiently than 
conventional power plants.

On Tuesday, senators voted 86-13 to limit further debate on the 
energy legislation to 30 hours and set late Thursday as the deadline 
for a final vote on the bill, which has been before the Senate for 
nearly six weeks.

With a deadline set, senators scurried to offer a last round of 
amendments, although none was likely to jeopardize the bill, which is 
expected to pass. The House already has approved a significantly 
different version, mirroring President Bush's energy agenda. The two 
will have to be merged.

On Wednesday, senators rejected, 58-39, an amendment by Sen. Maria 
Cantwell, D-Wash., that would have directed stronger consumer 
protection measures by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in 
electricity markets. She said the increased consumer protection is 
needed in the aftermath of market abuses by power providers in the 
West.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., the bill's manager, said the bill already 
provides adequate consumer protections "and will cure many of the 
problems" that surfaced in the West when electricity prices soared 
out of control.

The most glaring difference between the House and Senate bills is 
that the House would open the coastal plain of the Arctic National 
Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, while the Senate rejected disturbing 
the Alaskan refuge with development.

The Senate bill also contains a requirement that would triple the 
amount of ethanol to be used as an additive in gasoline. The ethanol 
mandate is opposed by many House members and is not included in the 
energy package they passed last August.

Also Tuesday, the Senate turned back by a 68-31 vote an attempt led 
by senators from California and New York to strip the Senate bill of 
the ethanol requirement. Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein of 
California and Charles Schumer of New York argued that the ethanol 
mandate would produce gasoline shortages and price increases of 7 
cents to 9 cents a gallon. "California will be required to use 
ethanol it doesn't need" to clean the air, Feinstein complained.

The ethanol proposal was crafted as part of a compromise that also 
bans the gasoline additive MTBE, which has been found to contaminate 
drinking water, and ends the requirement that refiners use an 
oxygenate to meet clean air standards. Its repeal could jeopardize 
the energy bill, supporters of the measure said.

Daschle, D-S.D., whose state is a prominent ethanol producer, 
disputed claims that the mandate, which would triple the amount of 
ethanol to be produced by 2010, would cause fuel shortages or gas 
prices to increase significantly. He called such claims "dead wrong 
... a myth" and cited Energy Department estimates that the ethanol 
would add no more than a penny a gallon on to the cost of gasoline.

The energy tax package, added to the bill by unanimous vote Tuesday, 
would provide $14.1 billion in tax breaks. About half the money would 
go for energy conservation and support for renewable energy sources. 
The other half would help producers of oil, gas, coal, and nuclear 
power.

Motorists would receive a $1,000 tax credit for buying hybrid 
gas-electric cars and homeowners $2,000 to install solar panels for 
heating water or other purposes. A $250 to $300 tax credit would be 
established to help homeowners install fuel-saving insulation, 
windows and doors, more efficient air conditioners, or heat pumps.

The tax incentives and breaks include:

á $4.4 billion for oil and gas producers.

á $3.2 billion for electric utilities that develop clean coal 
technologies and for nuclear power plants.

á $4 billion to encourage energy conservation and efficiency and use 
of alternative fuels in vehicles.

á $2.3 billion to encourage development of renewable fuels, including 
wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass sources.

Copyright 2002, Associated Press
All Rights Reserved



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/k6cvND/n97DAA/ySSFAA/9bTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://www.webconx.com/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to