Forward from the stoves list at Crest.

>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: "Tom Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Hydrogen Economy greatly overrated, biomass underrated...
>Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:18:03 -0600
>Organization: BEF
>
>Dear All Biomassers:
>
>The message below from my good friend Tom Milne, Bob Evans and all 
>anouncing a new report on hydrogen needs to be put in context. 
>Speaking as a fuel scientist, I hope I may be permitted a personal 
>diatribe in this forum.  If you are emotionally convinced that 
>hydrogen is the world's best fuel, and wish to stay convinced, 
>delete this message. .
>                                                                ~~~~~~~~~
>HYDROGEN has been known and used since the early part of the 19th 
>century.  It is easy to make in the laboratory from iron and HCL or 
>by electrolysis.
>
>Hydrogen is unique amongst the elements with outstandingly good and 
>bad properties.
>
>As a fuel it has the highest Mass Energy Density of any fuel by a 
>large margin, so liquid hydrogen isn't too bad a fuel if you can 
>afford the cost and keep it well insulated.  As a gas it also has a 
>very low Volume energy density (same as CO, 1/3 that of methane). 
>It is an important component of synthesis gas (CO + H2) and producer 
>gas (CO + H2 + N2).
>
>Hydrogen also has a flame velocity (2.83 m/s in air compared to .5 
>m/s for methane, propane etc.).  For this reason it is a difficult 
>automotive fuel, since stoichiometric combustion produces "hydrogen 
>knock".  However, it has the widest flamability limits so can be 
>burned very lean for better efficiency.
>
>Another hydrogen problem I haven't heard discussed is that it 
>contracts chemically 1/3 on burning according to
>
>H2 + 1/2 O2 [1.5 moles or voumes] ===> H2O [1 mole]
>
>by contrast, methane gets full value, since     CH4 + 2 O2 [3 moles] 
>===> CO2 + 2 H2O [3moles]
> 
>~~~~~~~
>Hydrogen is an important chemical for converting vegetable oils to 
>margarine etc. and is widely used in large chemical plants. 
>Electrolysis of water to make hydrogen is only 72% efficient (due to 
>high overvoltage), and conversion of heat to electricity is 
>typically 30% efficient, so electrolysis is 18% base efficiency. 
>Hydrogen can be made from methane and hydrocarbons using steam 
>reforming and the water gas shift reaction - probably 80% efficient.
>
>So for 150 years pure hydrogen was only used by quartz workers. 
>However, many gases, including our producer gas, can contain large 
>fractions of hydrogen - 18% in our current producer gas at CPC.
> 
>~~~~~~~~
>So how has hydrogen risen so high in research circles as a target fuel?
>
>It all started with "The Hydrogen Economy" about 1970.  At that time 
>we were naively told that nuclear electric power would be too cheap 
>to meter in a short time (Ha!).  But you can't run a car on 
>electricity so we would still need a "fuel tank".  Since power had 
>no cost, hydrogen from water would have no cost!  Voila.  I remember 
>hearing these arguments at the first "Hydrogen Economy" conference 
>held appropriately at the Playboy Club in Miami about 1974.
>
>We have since become disenchanted with the nuclear energy side of 
>this argument, but dreamers still talk of hydrogen combustion being 
>"non polluting" and therefore the ultimate fuel.
>
>Today's cars are amazingly clean compared to those of the smoggy 
>''70s, so they are relatively "non polluting" in the atmospheric 
>sense. However our current fossil fuels do increase atmospheric CO2 
>levels so can be considered "polluting" from a global warming 
>perspective. Don't worry, the oil will be gone soon at the present 
>rate of usage/wastage.
>
>For a REALISTIC view on hydrogen, check out.. 
>http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/hotline/pdf/hydrogen_economy.pdf
>
>Your Skeptical Fuel Scientist,                TOM REED 
>BEF GASWORKS
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Milne, Thomas" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Milne, Thomas" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:36 PM
>Subject: GAS-L: RE: Biomass to Hydrogen Report Web Address
>
> >
> >
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Milne, Thomas 
> > > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:27 AM
> > > To: <mailto:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 
><mailto:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 
><mailto:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> > > <mailto:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: FW: Biomass to Hydrogen Report Web Address
> > >
> > > Interested parties may access our recent IEA report, "Hydrogen from
> > > Biomass--State of the Art and Research Challenges", at the WEB address
> > > listed below.   The authors would welcome corrections or additions to
> > > references, as a supplement for Year 2002 is planned.
> > >
> > > Tom Milne, Carolyn Elam and
> > > Robert Evans.
> > >
> > >
> > >  -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Elam, Carolyn 
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:10 AM
> > > To: Milne, Thomas
> > > Subject: Biomass to Hydrogen Report Web Address
> > >
> > > http://www.eren.doe.gov/hydrogen/iea/pdfs/hydrogen_biomass.pdf


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Sell a Home for Top $
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTmEAA/ySSFAA/9bTolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Biofuels at Journey to Forever
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel at WebConX
http://www.webconx.dns2go.com/2000/biofuel/biofuel.htm
List messages are archived at the Info-Archive at NNYTech:
http://archive.nnytech.net/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


Reply via email to