"trinary fission" Stop! I have a patent on this!
Keith Addison wrote: >Hi Darryl > > > >>Darryl McMahon wrote: >> >> >> >>>Oh, come on Keith! Everyone knows you can't get that kind of performance >>>improvement without magnets and hydrogen injection using on-board >>> >>> >>splitting of >> >> >>>water based on zero-point energy. >>> >>> > >They laughed at Einstein too. (But they laughed at the Marx Brothers >even more.) > > > >>I like the "binary fission" angle though. >> >> > >Yes! New in the annals of energy scams. > > > >>>Imagine the kinds of performance improvements we'll get when I >>> >>> >>finish my research >> >> >>>on "trinary fission" (based on tritium, don't you know). >>> >>> > >Everyone's gone fission. > > > >>>Isn't fission elemental science, rather than molecular science? >>> >>> > >Naah, these guys are way ahead, they're working with molecular >elements and elementary molecules. > > > >>>Facetiously yours, >>> >>> > >:-) Likewise, > >Regards > >Keith > > > > >>>Darryl McMahon >>> >>>Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hello all >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Jerry Eyers wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Not to knock everyone who has responded so far, but such items do exist, >>>>>>although I don't believe 300 has been achieved, but there are documented >>>>>>cases of big block 350's getting over 200mpg. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Documented by whom? (By the way, a 350 is a small block.) Under >>>>>what test conditions? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>The process involves replacing the standard carb with a vapor >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>only carb (like a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>propane one) then pre-heating your fuel to a vapor, and feeding the >>>>>>vapor. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I have a lot of experience running gaseous fuels in engines, and >>>>>NEVER have I seen any evidence that a fully vaporized fuel (such as >>>>>propane or methane) can attain higher efficiencies than a fuel >>>>>injected liquid fueled engine. (Though it is true that certain gases, >>>>>hydrogen for example, can run leaner than gasoline. However, the >>>>>difference in economy is incremental.) The calorific value of gaseous >>>>>fuels is generally LESS than that of liquid fuels because they are not >>>>>as dense, yet the fuel economy remains proportional to the overall >>>>>energy available for combustion. >>>>> >>>>> To put it simply, vaporizing gasoline will not magically enhance fuel >>>>>economy. Among some people, there remains a persistent myth that >>>>>liquid fueled internal combustion engines are incapable of fully >>>>>burning a fuel load. People who believe this insist that the vast >>>>>majority of the air / fuel mixture leaving a combustion chamber is >>>>>unburned, yet this is simply NOT true! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>But it's such a good line Robert. What d'you think of this? I've just >>>>been instructed by the would-be purveyors to add their link to the >>>>biodiesel section of my website so they can promote it (it's not >>>>called Brand X): >>>> >>>>"Brand X, the new KING of Global green energy by molecular science >>>>and has the potential to add 30% more to the Global known fossil fuel >>>>reserves. Brand X works on the concept of deionization of >>>>electrically charged particle formed by gaining or losing electrons >>>>in a solution. Brand X gives more kilometres to every litre, for all >>>>diesel and gasoline internal combustion engines, respectively. Brand >>>>X reduces GHG emission, substantially by enhancing a total combustion >>>>technology with higher efficiency. As fossil fuel is exhaustible and >>>>Brand X can help to consume less fuel, until economical alternative >>>>energy is found. It eliminates smog-forming pollutants in all diesel >>>>internal combustion engine exhaust. Brand X is compatible with all >>>>kinds of internal combustion engines fuel by gasoline, diesel or >>>>biofuel, including fuel from biomass. Green Brand X availability is >>>>inexhaustible on Earth and eco-friendly." >>>> >>>>It works by "'binary fission' with additional vigour, by maximising >>>>combustion efficiency". Sounds great, think I'll buy some. Dammit, >>>>where's my wallet? >>>> >>>>Best wishes >>>> >>>>Keith >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>That said, I don't know of ANY that have worked with diesel engines, >>>>>>only straight gas. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> A diesel engine will outperform a gasoline engine by virtue of higher >>>>>compression pressure and the lack of a throttle, which considerably >>>>>reduces pumping losses. In addition, diesel fuel contains more energy >>>>>than gasoline. >>>>> >>>>>robert luis rabello >>>>>"The Edge of Justice" >>>>>Adventure for Your Mind >>>>>http://www.newadventure.ca >>>>> >>>>>Ranger Supercharger Project Page >>>>>http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/ >>>>> >>>>> > > >_______________________________________________ >Biofuel mailing list >Biofuel@sustainablelists.org >http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org > >Biofuel at Journey to Forever: >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html > >Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): >http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
