Great discussion threads. I find myself drawn in without restraint. IMO, the largest problem facing us via government isn't reactive governing, its waste (politically attractive) and vote buying (democracy).
While the case can be made for higher Government revenue requiremnts, it is predicated on the assumption that Government works efficiently. This is folly in the extreme sense. We are witness to personal agendas from the top down to the smallest fiefdom. A thick self-serving union layer checks, double checks or escalates every daily activity for dual custody deniability. A narrowly defined job scope is rigorously designed to allow the use of unskilled labor and systemically CYA when a resource is confronted by a new or evolutionary 'issue' (previously undefined). In other words the system loses issues where resources are not protected. Output is politically attractive in the form of plausible deniability. Action plans are equated to procedure and the optic of action. This results in "productivity" that is not objective driven. Rad ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:53:33 -0500 (EST) >There are major costs besides road maintenance and building, such as >health costs of pollution medical (National Health Service) and other >costs related to accidents, costs of policing. Back in the late 80's >Pollution Probe in Toronto published a study "The Costs of the Car" >which estimted that charging all costs to fuel would result in a total >gasoline price of $5 to$6 CDN per Imperial gallon. the price would be >almost double now. Also, the more roads the less land there is for >other uses and the lower the tax base to pay for ever increasing roads >and infrastructure. The ultimate solution is charges for road >use; difficult but becoming easier with the advance of computers and >electronics. > >Doug Woodard >St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada > > >On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Chris lloyd wrote: > >> > If you are talking about hybrids that use electricity the government >> gets the fuel side tax but would have a rough time implementing a zap >> tax for charging the vehicle but its not out of the question they may try.< >> >> Here in the UK we buy a licence to use our vehicles on public roads, I pay >> about 280 dollars a year which is far more than is required for road >> maintenance/building. Chris. >> >> Wessex Ferret Club >> www.wessexferretclub.co.uk >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Biofuel mailing list >> Biofuel@sustainablelists.org >> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org >> >> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: >> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html >> >> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): >> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Biofuel mailing list >Biofuel@sustainablelists.org >http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org > >Biofuel at Journey to Forever: >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html > >Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): >http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
