Gary Green, All I can say is that you're one twisted puppy, or at least you're dedicated to that direction.
A peaceful march that gets dogs, battans and boots set upon them is not something that can be honestly be blamed as causal. But you choose to do so, decidedly noting that the bee was already in their bonnet, almost implying that it's their fault for just being their. Or is it for just being? And "unrest?" You're labeling that as riotous behavior? Disatisfaction is grounds for stitches, casts and steel skull plates? You miss all the colors in the spectrum save for the two ends. And even then you try to paint both black and white in some perverse distortion of gray. Relative to Martin Luther King? > I didn't say he should die. No. You said >> That's why he had to be killed. As in necessary, mandatory, no option. And as for your "exactly?" Don't get carried away with yourself, thinking that you can snip and twist what I've written so that it appears to be in accord with your peculiar beliefs. When I wrote > Something about having a foot in the middle of > your back just doesn't cotton too well towards > the idea of "peace." I meant it literally. Doubtful that even your well-honed mind would sit their calmly with a trained police dog munching and shredding your leg while Billy and Joe Bob smash everything in swinging distance of a battan, inclusive of your spine. My bet is that you take great joy in this little game your playing, a useless drain on other people's time and almost a complete waste, other than exposing how singular your focus is, or that it's just chain jerking that you're about. Todd Swearingen Gary L. Green wrote: >On 14 Apr 2006, at 11:05, Appal Energy wrote: > > > >>>Whenever MLK came to town you knew you either gave him what >>>he wanted or you would have violence on your hands. >>> >>> >>Violence at who's initiation? >> >> >snip > > >>Something about having a foot in the middle of your back just doesn't >>cotton too well towards the idea of "peace." >> >> > >Exactly. I'm saying he didn't lead a band of trained peace >protesters, there were those but not all. The majority were regular >folk, of whatever race, that were pissed that things were the way >they were and if they didn't see things progressing they were prone >to display their displeasure. When I read about MLK, I also read >about "unrest". > > > > >>>That's why he had to be killed. >>> >>> >>Excuse me? Advocating equality is justification for murder? >>Let me guess..., I misunderstand what you wrote. >> >>Todd Swearingen >> >> > >Maybe. He was a proponent for change, for equality. In the great >scheme of U.S. empire building that comes contrary to profit. I'm >saying the same people that had Kennedy killed had MLK killed. >Justified? I never said that. I didn't say he should die. I said >that the powers that be were not about to leave him alive. > >Gary > >_______________________________________________ >Biofuel mailing list >Biofuel@sustainablelists.org >http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org > >Biofuel at Journey to Forever: >http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html > >Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): >http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
