I wonder how the incorporation of the effect of sensitivity to economies of
scale, if it could be quantified, would influence that score? I think the
Bentley and the Lambo would score a bit better?
Personally I find no advantage in the "greenest" 12 over the "meanest". Being
actually legal for sale, they all entrench corporate power, encourage mass
production, exascerbate the false social division between producer and
consumer, and tend to reduce us to a passive, uncritical circus-audience by
resisting our technological engagement and participation.
I'll not have any one of them on my property (but then I'll have no car
designed after 1975...)
-Dawie
From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 00:12:20 +0900
Reply-To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Subject: [Biofuel] Greenest and meanest of the year
Message: 1
Sigh... (once again)
http://www.greenercars.com/12green.html
GreenerCars.com: The Greenest Vehicles of 2007
http://www.greenercars.com/12mean.html
GreenerCars.com: The Meanest Vehicles for the Environment in 2007
___________________________________________________________
Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy
and free. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
