the market free-for-all wouldnt be such a big problem if it werent for the 
federal reserve and overpowered banks. nothing has really been right in the 
economy since 1913. the creature from jekyll's island has turned into a real 
hyde monster.


> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:19:13 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> Subject: [Biofuel] Fwd: [LittleHouses] There Is No Gas Shortage
>
> Bush is an oilman. What do you expect?
> Kirk
>
> sail4free  wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: sail4free 
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: [LittleHouses] There Is No Gas Shortage
>
> ==========
> It's rare that I would post a complete article -- especially one that is 
> arguably OT -- but this one strikes to the heart of what is going on with our 
> rapidly escalating fuel prices (with no end in sight). FWIW, we here in Idaho 
> (on average) have reduced our demand nearly 10% from one year ago -- no doubt 
> as a direct result of high prices. If you read only one article about the WHY 
> of gas prices this year, this needs to be that article:
> ==========
> Viewpoint April 1, 2008
> ==========
> There is No Gas Shortage, but Washington, Wall Street, and ethanol and oil 
> and gas companies want you to think there is, says automotive expert Ed 
> Wallace:
> ==========
> "They see speculation in the market, I see decline in global inventories. I 
> don't think this is a big surprise, that we've had a jump in price when there 
> has been a decrease in crude inventories."— Energy Secretary Sam Bodman, 
> Bloomberg News, Mar. 5, 2008
> ==========
> "It should be obvious to you all that the [gasoline] demand is outstripping 
> supply, which causes prices to go up." — President George W. Bush, Associated 
> Press, Mar. 5, 2008
> ==========
> One wonders if verifiable facts ever get in the way of this administration's 
> statements on issues that are critical to the average American's wellbeing. 
> After all, last time I checked, when politicians are elected to public 
> office, or appointed, as is Energy Secretary Samuel W. Bodman, they must take 
> an oath to the American people before assuming their new positions. How can 
> they forget a sacred oath so quickly? Were they daydreaming when they took 
> it, so it never meant anything to begin with? Maybe it's just another promise 
> you have to make to get into office: When you're securely incumbent you can 
> ignore even solemn oaths you took.
> ==========
> Obviously, the two quotes that led this article came from discussions 
> concerning the current high price for oil on the futures market. Bodman 
> appears to be protecting the speculators in oil, as opposed to looking after 
> the interests of all Americans. President Bush, apparently, has never talked 
> to the Energy Dept.'s Energy Information Agency to see whether gasoline 
> demand is actually up. More troubling, the writer of that particular 
> Associated Press article obviously didn't look up the EIA's numbers to verify 
> the President's assertions. They weren't accurate.
> ==========
> 1. There Is No Shortage
> ==========
> Gasoline reserves on hand are at the highest levels since the early 1990s, 
> which is remarkable considering the nation's refineries have been cutting 
> back on the production of gasoline because their margins have declined. In 
> fact, average gasoline reserves on hand have risen since this past October, 
> while oil reserves in this country have gone up virtually every week this 
> year—and only fog in the Houston Ship Channel that kept oil tankers from 
> unloading their crude one week kept it from being every week.
> ==========
> In the same Bloomberg article that quotes from Bodman's CNBC appearance on 
> Mar. 4, he also said that it was thanks to ethanol that the gasoline problem 
> isn't even worse. He then added that the fact that making ethanol is forcing 
> up prices of other farm commodities, including hog and chicken feed, is 
> "nowhere near as important as trying to relieve pressure on [gasoline] 
> supplies."
> ==========
> Of course, there is no pressure on gasoline supplies in this country as of 
> today, but Bodman's statement must have made eyes roll among the executives 
> at Pilgrim's Pride PPC; the Pittsburg, (Tex.) poultry producer announced 
> 1,100 layoffs on Mar. 13, closing one processing plant and 6 of their 13 
> distribution centers because their company's outlay for chicken feed went up 
> $600 million last fiscal year and was on track to increase by another $700 
> million this year.
> ==========
> Here's the scorecard, in case you missed it. There's no shortage of gasoline 
> or oil in the U.S. today, and we have near-record reserves on hand. Meanwhile 
> the Congressional mandate for ethanol has jacked up the price of chicken feed 
> for Pilgrim's Pride, which is the U.S.'s largest processor of chickens and 
> turkeys—by $1.3 billion. And that's for just one company processing chicken. 
> This is what passes for acceptable to our Energy Secretary?
> ==========
> 2. Demand Is DOWN, Yet Prices Are UP
> ==========
> Just so we can all get on the same page, here are the verifiable facts on oil 
> supplies, production, and gasoline demand.
> ==========
> In January of this year, the U.S. used 4% less petroleum than we did a year 
> ago. (Oil demand was down 3.2% in February.) Furthermore, demand has been 
> falling slowly since July of last year. Ronald Bailey of Reason Online has 
> pointed out that worldwide production of oil has risen 2.5% in the first 
> quarter, while worldwide demand has grown by only 2%.
> ==========
> Production is expected to increase by 3.3% in the second quarter, and by as 
> much as 4.1% by the third quarter. The net result is that the U.S. daily 
> buffer for oil production against demand, which was a paltry 1.5 million 
> barrels as recently as 2005, is now up to 3 million barrels in excess 
> capacity today.
> ==========
> So what is going on here? Why would our Energy Secretary say there's a supply 
> and demand problem when none exists? Why would he say that speculators have 
> little or nothing to do with the incredibly high price of oil and gasoline, 
> when it's clear they do? President Bush—a former oilman—gives the 
> ever-growing demand for gasoline as the primary reason prices are so high, 
> yet that notion can be dispelled with one minute of research. That's the 
> problem with rhetoric; it rarely matches the facts.
> ==========
> 3. Speculation is Up, and the Dollar Is Down
> ==========
> On the same day the President and our Energy Secretary made those foolish 
> comments, no less an authority than ExxonMobil (XOM) Chief Executive Officer 
> Rex Tillerson was quoted by Marketwatch as saying, "The record run in oil 
> prices is related more to speculation and a weakening dollar than supply and 
> demand in the market." He added, "In terms of fundamentals, fear of supply 
> reliability is overblown."
> ==========
> As for the speculators, in 2000 approximately $9 billion was invested in oil 
> futures, while today that number has gone up to $250 billion. Now, if any 
> publicly traded company had an additional $241 billion put into its stock in 
> the same period, its stock would rise out of sight too—even if the company 
> was not worth anywhere near that amount of market capitalization.
> ==========
> Moving on to the weak U.S. dollar as a primary cause for skyrocketing oil 
> prices—there is "some" truth in that statement. But consider this: The dollar 
> has depreciated 30% against the world's currencies since 2002, while the 
> price of oil has gone up 500%. So is it the weak dollar that has caused a 
> 500% increase in the price of oil, or is it the extra $241 billion worth of 
> speculation? You can make the call on that one.
> ==========
> Possibly just to ensure oil prices don't respond to real-world market 
> conditions, Goldman Sachs (GS) forecast on Mar. 7 that turbulence in the oil 
> market could cause oil to spike as high as $200 a barrel. This flies in the 
> face of all known information—but then again, Goldman Sachs is the world's 
> biggest trader of energy derivatives, and its Goldman Sachs Commodities Index 
> is a widely watched barometer of energy and commodities prices.
> ==========
> What Is Washington Thinking?
> ==========
> Rounding out the list of experts discussing our oil and gasoline situation is 
> Bill Klesse, head of San Antonio (Tex.) Valero Energy (VLO). He spoke in San 
> Diego a week after those comments from Goldman Sachs, the President, and 
> Secretary Bodman. Believe it or not, Klesse said poor margins may cause 
> Valero to sell one-third of its refinery operations; he stated that poor 
> margins in recent months had caused planned refinery expansions—which would 
> have produced 500,000 more barrels per day—to be canceled. Moreover, 
> according to a report from Reuters on Mar. 11, 2008, Klesse recently released 
> the information that gasoline production has been curtailed in response to 
> slowing demand.
> ==========
> Imagine that: Refiners cut gasoline production, yet gasoline reserves have 
> grown to their largest since late 1992. So much for "surging demand."
> ==========
> Klesse also called for the government to start imposing a tariff on imported 
> gasoline to protect U.S. refiners' profits. Protectionism? As famed economist 
> John Kenneth Galbraith correctly said, "In America, the only respectable form 
> of socialism is socialism for the rich."
> ==========
> Which takes us back to the original question: Why is Washington doing 
> everything it can to convince us there is a shortage when there isn't one? 
> After all, the only people they're protecting are those heavily invested in 
> oil futures—and that's to the detriment of all other Americans.
> ==========
> We're Paying for What?
> ==========
> When it became undeniable that poor decision-making by company executives had 
> put a respected 85-year-old U.S. institution in financial peril, why did the 
> Federal Reserve rush in to save investment bank Bear Stearns (BSC)? Of 
> course, we need to restore confidence in our financial institutions, but why 
> protect the personal assets of those who were responsible for the mess? Both 
> the corporation's officers and its board members should contribute their 
> personal assets toward saving the bank they put in the ditch—the bank all of 
> us are going to pay to bail out.
> ==========
> Instead, the Bush administration is protecting those responsible for creating 
> yet another speculative bubble in oil futures, and is protecting investors in 
> the ethanol industry—much to the detriment of food-processing companies such 
> as Pilgrim's Pride. And the net result of all this is that the prices of 
> crude and gasoline rise ever higher thanks to a "shortage" that does not 
> exist, while food costs are soaring thanks in part to the ethanol mandate.
> ==========
> The Federal Reserve lowers interest rates, but the cost of mortgages goes up 
> six weeks in a row—and last month Bank of America (BAC) credit-card holders 
> started being charged more than 24% interest on new purchases.
> ==========
> This is what they call "Republican Prosperity?" Ronald Reagan was both right 
> and wrong when he said, "Government is not the solution, government is the 
> problem." And government is still the problem. Instead of a fair and open 
> market they gave us a free-for-all marketplace with no regulations at all, 
> which lately these "bubble boys" have sent south for all of us.
> ==========
> One would guess that Washington missed the obvious: Protect all U.S. 
> consumers and you're also protecting business expansion.
> ==========
> http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/apr2008/bw2008041_945564_page_3.htm
>
> ==========
> sail4free
> ==========
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>  To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LittleHouses/
>
>  Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
>  To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LittleHouses/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>  To change settings via email:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: /pipermail/attachments/20080422/65f687b6/attachment.html
> _______________________________________________
> Biofuel mailing list
> Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
> http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
>
> Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
> http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
>
> Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

_________________________________________________________________
Make i'm yours.  Create a custom banner to support your cause.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Contribute/Default.aspx?source=TXT_TAGHM_MSN_Make_IM_Yours
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to