Jeff

There are all kinds of nontechnical reasons for E85, a lot of politics and 
hidden economic issues, not to mention concerted misinformation. Brazil has had 
E96 available for ages without any engine problems, the remaining 4% in that 
case being mainly water. It's been done; it's been proven repeatedly. Take a 
look at the JtF ethanol pages, follow the links, and see if you can get hold of 
David Blume's aforementioned book.

I wonder if your Chevy V6 was ever available in anything in Brazil, and if 
there was an 'alcool' version? Somehow I'd be surprised: GM wouldn't want any 
Americans getting hold of the specs!

Tetraethyl lead wasn't a lubricant as such, as the areas where it was effective 
weren't subject to rubbing friction. It was more of a cushioning agent, which 
prevented the valves from slowly hammering the valve seats into the cylinder 
head. The fitment of hardened steel valve seat inserts in aluminium cylinder 
heads, which would otherwise suffer valve-seat recession even with TEL, has 
rendered that function of TEL redundant. Inserts can be and are fitted to iron 
heads, and once they're in they're in.

As for the emissions controls, none of them are about residues resulting from 
fuel impurities. In fact, both EGR and PCV INTRODUCE impurities! In the latter 
case it's a motor-oil mist from the crankcase, which should be more than 
sufficient for your lubrication concerns. I have never owned a car that has 
had any "smog equipment" whatsoever, by the way, and I don't plan on getting 
one. It was the wrong approach to the problem from the start.

-Dawie




________________________________
From: Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February, 2009 20:36:24
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Viability of converting a vehicle to run straight 
Ethanol?

Most people don't realize just how dirty fossil fuel is. It has a lot of bad 
stuff in it. This is not something I intend to get into a heated argument 
about. When you look at the normal car engine, it has a lot of emission 
controls on it to reduce emissions. By contrast, when you burn ethanol, the 
emissions go down, considerably. Ethanol burns a lot cleaner then fossil fuel. 
When you look at the pollution residue that is left when fossil fuel burns, 
that residue provides lubrication.  

You can find biodiesel station that sell B-100 as well as B-20. If ethanol 
could be burned as easily, then you would find a similar thing where you would 
see E-100 as well as E-85 stations. 

A lot of people forget about when they took lead out of gas, in 1985, that lead 
was providing lubrication for the valves and heads. The valves and heads 
started wearing out quick and a lot of mechanics made good money fixing them. 
Then, engines were improve so that unleaded gas wouldn't  wear out the heads 
and valves as quick. Hopefully, in the near future, engines will be redesign so 
that they can burn 100% ethanol. But right now, they are not. 

I would highly suggest you talk to someone in the know in the ethanol industry 
to see if I am right or not. I don't want to see anyone mess up a motor just to 
prove a point. 

Jeff

--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Dawie Coetzee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Dawie Coetzee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Viability of converting a vehicle to run straight 
Ethanol?
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 9:38 PM

I'd be inclined to dispute that.

I don't think the petrochemical component contributes any significant
lubrication: I don't think it consists of those sorts of fractions. It would
be almost as good a solvent/cleanser as the ethanol if it weren't quite
dirty already.

There are two friction areas that are in contact with fuel: the piston ring
lands and the valve guides. The former is lubricated, albeit somewhat
informally, from below. The latter is formed of materials chosen under the
assumption that there will be no lubrication. In both cases sealing is never
absolutely perfect; some oil will make it past the rings and valve-stem seals.
The concentration of oil where you find oil is far greater than that of fuel
in the air/fuel mixture, even at ethanol's stoichiometry. If your ethanol
is washing oil off, your mixture is too rich or your ignition isn't working.

Just off the top of my head.

Best regards

Dawie Coetzee

 
<snip>


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20090212/667870f2/attachment.html 
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
[email protected]
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to