Hello all

I really hope we can help Jim Chalker meet his target.

Please respond onlist, not direct to Jim (he's a list member now).

All best

Keith


>>>Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:56:11 -0400
>>>From: Jim Chalker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Organization: Adams County Office of Economic Development
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Subject: About that algae
>>>
>>>Keith,
>>>
>>>I am the economic development director for a small, poor, rural 
>>>Ohio county, Adams.  I am looking at the biofuels industry with 
>>>the hope that it could transform our local economy.  But whenever 
>>>I crunch the numbers my hopes are always dashed it seems.  Here in 
>>>Ohio our state legislature jumped on the 25 by 25 bandwagon (at 
>>>least halfway).  We have been committed to 12% renewable energy in 
>>>electrical production by 2025.
>>>
>>>I looked into this to see if it would envigorate our timber 
>>>industry.  If we harvest all the wood chips we can without 
>>>exceeding sustainable harvest levels we can only meet 1/14th of 
>>>the required biomass (assuming 100% efficient power stations - the 
>>>reality is more like 40%).  Then I decided to look at switchgrass. 
>>>We can meet the requirement, but only by diverting nearly 8% of 
>>>our farmland away from food production to energy.  Food price 
>>>inflation would be substantial, and that's the best case.
>>>
>>>The only hope I have left is algae.  The way I saw it, algae can 
>>>step in to meet the energy needs of the power industry since it 
>>>gets such spectacular yields.  In the early years of deployment we 
>>>sell raw algae as biomass while the scientists keep working on 
>>>extracting advanced biofuels from it.  But when I went searching 
>>>for crop yield numbers I came away disappointed.  From the looks 
>>>of it algae may not yield much more per acre than switchgrass, and 
>>>let's not even start mention the startup costs.
>>>
>>>So are we spinning our wheels or what?  Do you think algae can be 
>>>commercially grown for biomass alone?  I would like to hear your 
>>>thoughts.
>>>
>>>Jim Chalker
>>>Director of Economic Development
>>>Adams County, Ohio
>>
>>
>>Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:52 +0900
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: About that algae
>>
>>It's all hype Jim. It just doesn't exist yet. See:
>>
>>Ethanol from cellulose
>>http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol_link.html#cellulose
>>
>>Oil from algae
>>http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_yield.html#alg
>>
>>Sorry about that.
>>
>>This is what we've often said:
>>
>>"Merely replacing fossil fuels is not the answer. A rational and 
>>sustainable energy future requires great reductions in energy use 
>>(currently mostly waste), great improvements in energy use 
>>efficiency, and, most important, decentralisation of supply to the 
>>small-scale or farm-scale local-economy level, along with the use 
>>of all ready-to-use renewable energy technologies in combination as 
>>the local circumstances require."
>>
>>Best wishes
>>
>>Keith Addison
>>Journey to Forever
>>KYOTO Pref., Japan
>>http://journeytoforever.org/
>
>
>Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:52 +0900
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: About that algae
>
>Hello again Jim
>
>I know that wasn't very encouraging. It was very late and that was 
>the last thing I did before I fell over for the night, but I wanted 
>to put you off this false trail.
>
>I think you can achieve the 12/25 goal, and probably 25/25, or even 
>better. Have a look at this, for a start, it might give you some 
>ideas:
>
>"How much fuel can we grow? How much land will it take?"
><http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html#howmuch>
>
>This, for instance:
>
>  >"Using existing technology we can save three fourths of all 
>electricity used today. The best energy policy for the nation, for 
>business, and for the environment is one that focuses on using 
>electricity efficiently," says Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain 
>Institute in the US.
>  >
>  >"More efficient use is already America's biggest energy source -- 
>not oil, gas, coal, or nuclear power. By 2000, reduced 'energy 
>intensity' (compared with 1975) was providing 40 percent of all U.S. 
>energy services. It was 73 percent greater than U.S. oil 
>consumption, five times domestic oil production, three times total 
>oil imports, and 13 times Persian Gulf oil imports. The lower 
>intensity was mostly achieved by more productive use of energy (such 
>as better-insulated houses, better-designed lights and motors, and 
>cars that were safer, cleaner, more powerful, and got more miles per 
>gallon), partly by shifts in the economic mix, and only slightly by 
>behavioral change. Since 1996, saved energy has been the nation's 
>fastest-growing major 'source.'"
>
>Many people are already working on these problems and finding 
>solutions, whether backyarders, local coops, farmers or whatever, 
>and many more would like to, especially in view of the current 
>debacle in the Gulf, but they need some encouragement and guidance. 
>You have to reach out to people at the local level. That might mean 
>that you'll need extra resources at your command, but I'm sure it 
>will be worth your while.
>
>I'm taking the liberty of signing you up to our Biofuels list 
>discussion group. There are some very smart people there, and they 
>don't just talk, they're active in these areas. I hope it'll raise 
>some useful discussion. I'll forward this message to the list as an 
>introduction.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Keith Addison
>Journey to Forever
>KYOTO Pref., Japan
>http://journeytoforever.org/


_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

Reply via email to