Common Dreams
Investigation Uncovers Carbon Credits Smokescreen
By  Fiona Harvey / Stephen Fidler

LONDON - Companies and individuals rushing  to go green have been spending 
millions on “carbon credit” projects that yield  few if any environmental 
benefits.A Financial Times investigation has uncovered  widespread failings in 
the 
new markets for greenhouse gases, suggesting some  organisations are paying 
for emissions reductions that do not take place.
_Others  are meanwhile making big profits from carbon trading for very small 
expenditure  and in some cases for clean-ups that they would have made anyway. 
_ (http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/0426_04.jpg) 
The  growing political salience of environmental politics has sparked a “
green gold  rush”, which has seen a dramatic expansion in the number of 
businesses 
offering  both companies and individuals the chance to go “carbon neutral”, 
offsetting  their own energy use by buying carbon credits that cancel out 
their contribution  to global warming.
The burgeoning regulated market for carbon credits is  expected to more than 
double in size to about $68.2bn by 2010, with the  unregulated voluntary 
sector rising to $4bn in the same period.
The FT  investigation found:
Widespread instances of people and organisations buying  worthless credits 
that do not yield any reductions in carbon  emissions.
Industrial companies profiting from doing very little - or from  gaining 
carbon credits on the basis of efficiency gains from which they have  already 
benefited substantially.
Brokers providing services of questionable  or no value.
A shortage of verification, making it difficult for buyers to  assess the 
true value of carbon credits.
Companies and individuals being  charged over the odds for the private 
purchase of European Union carbon permits  that have plummeted in value because 
they 
do not result in emissions  cuts.
Francis Sullivan, environment adviser at HSBC, the UK’s biggest bank  that 
went carbon-neutral in 2005, said he found “serious credibility concerns”  in 
the offsetting market after evaluating it for several months.
“The police,  the fraud squad and trading standards need to be looking into 
this. Otherwise  people will lose faith in it,” he said.
These concerns led the bank to ignore  the market and fund its own carbon 
reduction projects directly.
Some  companies are benefiting by asking “green” consumers to pay them for 
cleaning up  their own pollution. For instance, DuPont, the chemicals company, 
invites  consumers to pay $4 to eliminate a tonne of carbon dioxide from its 
plant in  Kentucky that produces a potent greenhouse gas called HFC-23. But the 
equipment  required to reduce such gases is relatively cheap. DuPont refused 
to comment and  declined to specify its earnings from the project, saying it 
was at too early a  stage to discuss.
The FT has also found examples of companies setting up as  carbon offsetters 
without appearing to have a clear idea of how the markets  operate. In 
response to FT inquiries about its sourcing of carbon credits, one  company, 
carbonvoucher.com, said it had not taken payments for offsets.
Blue  Source, a US offsetting company, invites consumers to offset carbon 
emissions by  investing in enhanced oil recovery, which pumps carbon dioxide 
into 
depleted oil  wells to bring up the remaining oil. However, Blue Source said 
that because of  the high price of oil, this process was often profitable in 
itself, meaning  operators were making extra revenues from selling “carbon 
credits” for burying  the carbon.
There is nothing illegal in these practices. However, some  companies that 
are offsetting their emissions have avoided such projects because  customers 
may 
find them controversial.
BP said it would not buy credits  resulting from improvements in industrial 
efficiency or from most renewable  energy projects in developed countries.
Additional reporting by Rebecca  Bream




----------------------------------------------------
Gay  Nicholson, Ph.D. 

607-533-7312 (home office)
607-279-6618  (cell)

1 Maple Avenue
Lansing, NY  14882
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sustainable Tompkins 
Program  Coordinator 
w_ww.sustainabletompkins.org_ (http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/) 

Southern Tier Energy$mart Communities
Regional  Coordinator
Cornell Cooperative Extension of Tompkins County
615 Willow  Ave., Ithaca, NY 14850
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to