Maiken
We hadn't put together anything on 350 but perhaps we should.  

I have compiled some links and have articles archived. What do you have.  I'll 
also send you the enriched version vua private email

Jeanne



350 WEBSITE  http://www.350.org/4/

 

 

Slide Show:Global Warming* The Perfect Storm Jim Hansen

29 January 2008 Health Implications of Climate Change Royal College of 
Physicians London, United Kingdom *Any statements relating to policy are 
personal opinion 

 

http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2008/RoyalCollPhyscns_20080129.pdf

 

 

THE GUARDIAN    Monday, April 7, 2008 

Climate Target Is Not Radical Enough – Study

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/07/climatechange.carbonemissions

 

 

WASHINGTON POST 

Remember This: 350 Parts Per Million

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/27/AR2007122701942_pf.html

By Bill McKibben     Friday, December 28, 2007; A21

This month may have been the most important yet in the two-decade history of 
the fight against global warming. Al Gore got his Nobel in Stockholm; 
international negotiators made real progress on a treaty in Bali; and in 
Washington, Congress actually worked up the nerve to raise gas mileage 
standards for cars.

But what may turn out to be the most crucial development went largely 
unnoticed. It happened at an academic conclave in San Francisco. A NASA 
scientist named James Hansen offered a simple, straightforward and mind-blowing 
bottom line for the planet: 350, as in parts per million carbon dioxide in the 
atmosphere. It's a number that may make what happened in Washington and Bali 
seem quaint and nearly irrelevant. It's the number that may define our future.

 

WORLD CHANGING

http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007744.html

"The evidence indicates we've aimed too high -- that the safe upper limit for 
atmospheric CO2 is no more than 350 ppm," says Jim Hansen. 

350: That is the level to which Hansen believes we need to reduce the 
concentration of carbon dioxide (and by implication, other greenhouse gases) in 
the atmosphere if we want to avoid a series of catastrophic climate tipping 
points.

The bad news? Atmospheric carbon is already at least 383 ppm, and the rate at 
which we're spewing greenhouse gases is increasing. In other words, we've seen 
the credible bar for achieving climate stability drop from 550 to 450 to 350 
over roughly the last year. Bill McKibben walks us through the implications

 

 

 

 
   




-----Original Message-----
From: Maiken Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sustainable Tompkins County listserv 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 5:39 pm
Subject: Re: [SustainableTompkins] Wind vs coal in county



Margaret,
Will you have info on 350? I was planning on having some at the bag group,
oth 38.
Maiken

_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/ 

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to