At the Schlumberger Open House last month in Horseheads, I spent about 90 
minutes in a 1-on-1 conversation with the man who heads up the whole operation 
there. It was his contention that they would be recovering and recycling 
approximately 10% of the fracking fluid, and the other 90% would either come up 
gradually over time in the produced water, or be lost into the system, and 
never recovered. I did not find this information at all comforting, especially 
in light of the fact that produced water is far less tightly-regulated, and may 
even be spread legally on roads, as I understand things currently.

>From: Joel and Sarah Gagnon <[email protected]>
To: Sustainable Tompkins County listserv
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [SustainableTompkins] Fw: Story from Daily Review:
        Citizens can use technology to monitor contamination from Marcellus
        shale activity
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed

The article indicates that they reuse it for fracking, diluting it with new 
water. The article also notes that Fortuna was a little surprised to find 
that salt buildup was not a problem with fluid recovered from this 
formation. If that proves to be the case across the region, it would be it 
would be extraordinarily helpful in reducing the environmental impacts of 
fracking.

Joel
_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
Questions about the list? ask [email protected]
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to