Hi Ron. > > it would still be a procedural paradigm. > > Hmmm. Nope.... as declarative as XForms and SVG, no different.
So if you don't need C#, then what happens when you click on that button? What hooks it to the application? What is the application code written in? Where does the application code sit? Does the application code sit on the server? If so, does that app code work with anything other than IIS? After looking at this blog (http://www.xamlblogs.com/) it seems to me like XAML is just an expensive version of SPARK? The SPARK project new motto: "SVG+SPARK - an open source alternative to XAML". ;p Alastair --- In svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, "mobiform" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Great comments! Some clarifications > > > > XAML on the other hand would use XML mark-up to create an Avalon- > based input > > box, initialise it with values, give it styling, and so on. But > despite the > > angle brackets, it would still be a procedural paradigm. (And need > to be > > converted to C#.) > > > XAML is not converted into C#. It is converted directly into IL and > binary native to the platform it is sitting on via reflection. > > > > > it would still be a procedural paradigm. > > Hmmm. Nope.... as declarative as XForms and SVG, no different. > > > Ron ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
