On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:07 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:53:01PM +0000, Ken Smith wrote: > > Author: kensmith > > Date: Fri Sep 18 14:53:01 2009 > > New Revision: 197313 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/197313 > > > > Log: > > Have sparc64 join the separate livefs crowd. Including the docs packages > > on disc1 (needed now by sysinstall) overflows the target CDROM iso size. > > I've always been wondering how could docs be more important than livefs? > I'd rather have -docs iso (which I won't ever download anyways) than > -livefs one (which is needed far more often, e.g. to fix botched or > corrupted installation) in addition to disc1. > > ./danfe
Bottom line on this one is that what's better for novice users is
winning out over what's better for more advanced users. Having
sysinstall do its thing with minimal effort (have everything it *needs*
available on the same disc) gives us less of a black eye when novices
try it, the folks who barely know what they're doing but write reviews
for magazines/blogs/etc try it, etc...
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
