On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:07 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I've always been wondering how could docs be more important than livefs? > I'd rather have -docs iso (which I won't ever download anyways) than > -livefs one (which is needed far more often, e.g. to fix botched or > corrupted installation) in addition to disc1.
[ Sorry, a bit distracted testing RC1 stuff right now so I forgot to add
to the first reply ... ]
I also tested dropping SEPARATE_LIVEFS from both amd64 and i386 earlier
in the release cycle just to see if that was even an option and it was
not. Without SEPARATE_LIVEFS the disc1 iso image overflowed our target
size even with no packages on it.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
