* Carlos A. M. dos Santos <unixma...@gmail.com> wrote: > COMPAT_FREEBSD32 is an unfortunate choice. It can be easily > interpreted as "compatible with FreeBSD 3.2".
That's no problem, since COMPAT_FREEBSD%d was already a misnomer. It would have been a lot better if it were replaced by a numerical definition: options COMPAT_FREEBSD_MAJOR=7 -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgprqtw6FzxZr.pgp
Description: PGP signature