On 2020-08-27 17:06, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans <kev...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer >>> than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache? >>> >>> slippy$ lh /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.6K Aug 25 07:19 /boot/zfs/zpool.cache >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.7K Aug 27 06:20 /etc/zfs/zpool.cache >>> slippy$ >>> >>> Something like, for I in $(ls -t /etc/zfs/zpool.cache >>> /boot/zfs/zpool.cache) with the break? >>> >> >> /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is the new location and should generally be >> favored if it exists, I reckon. > > I retract the above. :-) ls -t makes sense. >
I actually was about to agree with your first suggestion. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
