On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:59 AM Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 2020-08-27 17:06, Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:05 AM Kyle Evans <kev...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> What would you suggest in this case, where /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is newer > >>> than /boot/zfs/zpool.cache? > >>> > >>> slippy$ lh /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache > >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.6K Aug 25 07:19 /boot/zfs/zpool.cache > >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4.7K Aug 27 06:20 /etc/zfs/zpool.cache > >>> slippy$ > >>> > >>> Something like, for I in $(ls -t /etc/zfs/zpool.cache > >>> /boot/zfs/zpool.cache) with the break? > >>> > >> > >> /etc/zfs/zpool.cache is the new location and should generally be > >> favored if it exists, I reckon. > > > > I retract the above. :-) ls -t makes sense. > > > > I actually was about to agree with your first suggestion. >
I think it's the correct long-term solution, but it kind of depends on what we're thinking now- if we expect one might test-boot a disk on an older FreeBSD/ZFS that's still using /boot, there's a chance it will contain the more recent data. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
