On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:51:25PM +0000, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Author: pjd
> Date: Wed Jul  4 19:51:25 2012
> New Revision: 238118
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238118
> 
> Log:
>   Prefer sysctl to open/read/close for obtaining random data.
>   This method is more sandbox-friendly and also should be faster as only
>   one syscall is needed instead of three.
>   In case of an error fall back to the old method.
>   
>   Reviewed by:        simon, gleb
>   MFC after:  2 weeks
IMO it is weird and against a purpose of sysctl that kern.arand sysctl
exists at all. I would prefer to not spread its usage more. We have
to keep it to preserve ABI compatibility, but I do not think that the
location for random data provider is right, not to mention higher
overhead of sysctl machinery.

I do think that /dev/random is the right approach, or (less preferable)
you could consider adding syscall to get randomness.

Attachment: pgprp69c4ZNzH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to