On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:33:51PM +0000, Attilio Rao wrote: A> > Doesn't this padding to cache line size only help x86 processors in an A> > SMP kernel? I was expecting to see some #ifdef SMP so that we don't pay A> > a big price for no gain in small-memory ARM systems and such. But maybe A> > I'm misunderstanding the reason for the padding. A> A> I didn't want to do this because this would be meaning that SMP option A> may become a completely killer for modules/kernel ABI compatibility.
Do we support loading non-SMP modules on SMP kernel and vice versa? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
