No, we should upgrade the cluster, watch it fail, and then let people experience their own handiwork.
Sheesh. :( -adrian On 9 August 2013 14:19, Peter Wemm <pe...@wemm.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> ... ? >> >> Can we please back it all out and then re-test attilio's patch with >> alan's fix, before committing it all again? >> >> I kinda have a vested interest at ${WORK} to be able to test -10 HEAD >> right now for all these performance investigations and fixes that need >> to happen for us; having the VM change and break _right now_ is going >> to actually cause us pain. > > The current state of HEAD also kinda rules out refreshing freebsd.org > machines this week too. > > -- > Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV > UTF-8: for when a ' just won\342\200\231t do. > <brueffer> ZFS must be the bacon of file systems. "everything's better with > ZFS" _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"