No, we should upgrade the cluster, watch it fail, and then let people
experience their own handiwork.
Sheesh. :(
-adrian
On 9 August 2013 14:19, Peter Wemm <pe...@wemm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> ... ?
>>
>> Can we please back it all out and then re-test attilio's patch with
>> alan's fix, before committing it all again?
>>
>> I kinda have a vested interest at ${WORK} to be able to test -10 HEAD
>> right now for all these performance investigations and fixes that need
>> to happen for us; having the VM change and break _right now_ is going
>> to actually cause us pain.
>
> The current state of HEAD also kinda rules out refreshing freebsd.org
> machines this week too.
>
> --
> Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV
> UTF-8: for when a ' just won\342\200\231t do.
> <brueffer> ZFS must be the bacon of file systems. "everything's better with
> ZFS"
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
