On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > No, we should upgrade the cluster, watch it fail, and then let people > experience their own handiwork.
It could turn out a bit like this: http://devopsreactions.tumblr.com/post/57780524288/our-engineers-are-working-to-fix-the-problem-in-the > Sheesh. :( > > > > -adrian > > > On 9 August 2013 14:19, Peter Wemm <pe...@wemm.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> ... ? >>> >>> Can we please back it all out and then re-test attilio's patch with >>> alan's fix, before committing it all again? >>> >>> I kinda have a vested interest at ${WORK} to be able to test -10 HEAD >>> right now for all these performance investigations and fixes that need >>> to happen for us; having the VM change and break _right now_ is going >>> to actually cause us pain. >> >> The current state of HEAD also kinda rules out refreshing freebsd.org >> machines this week too. >> >> -- >> Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV >> UTF-8: for when a ' just won\342\200\231t do. >> <brueffer> ZFS must be the bacon of file systems. "everything's better with >> ZFS" -- Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV UTF-8: for when a ' just won\342\200\231t do. <brueffer> ZFS must be the bacon of file systems. "everything's better with ZFS" _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
