On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:22:03AM +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: > > But I have yet to see a coherent argument here -- size(1) numbers, RSS > figures etc. -- about how it allegedly adds bloat. Most of what I've > seen so far is POLA, NIH resistance, and hand-wavery. >
It is not alleged. I actaully measured the bloat libxo caused when w(1) was converted. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-March/054917.html Here's the bloat with ls(1) % ldd /bin/ls /bin/ls: libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x2807d000) libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2808f000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280db000) % ll /bin/ls -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 28568 Jun 7 21:01 /bin/ls* % ldd /bin/ls /bin/ls: libutil.so.9 => /lib/libutil.so.9 (0x2807d000) libncursesw.so.8 => /lib/libncursesw.so.8 (0x2808f000) libxo.so.0 => /lib/libxo.so.0 (0x280db000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280ec000) laptop-kargl:kargl[204] ll /bin/ls -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 31376 Jun 14 10:06 /bin/ls* -- Steve _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"