> On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:53, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> We have busybox already - it's called bsdbox, and it's in base, and
> we're already using it, and yes, it does pull in libxo. :)
>
> I'm not worried about the size increase of libxo. That's the wrong
> thing to focus on. If it gets much more bloated then I'll poke people
> with the big "what are you thinking" stick. The issues people have
> aren't size related, they're "this API needs improvement and we have
> bugs introduced into tools."
>
> I do like how zero percent of the comments are "hey, maybe we need
> unit tests that run these tools and ensure they output the right
> stuff." If this were ${WORK} and I were ${BOSS}, I'd have asked the
> libxo developers to include unit tests before/after for each thing
> they broke, so we don't have a repeat of this kind of thing. But, this
> apparently isn't ${WORK} and I definitely don't want to be anyones
> boss, so..
Ugh. I'll write the tests ;(...
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
