Mark Winterhalder schrieb: > Yes, the Flash IDE is what I meant. > > I'd be curious about an experiment somebody with access to Flash could > do: A simple SWF with just a single PNG, once with lowest compression, > then highest compression, and how those compare to each other and a > Swfmill equivalent. > I mean, we can see with Zlib how lossless compression can differ > depending on how many cycles you throw at it, but if SWF's lossless > compression varies in size, I wonder why it's not at highest per > default. > > Mark
Tested it at work, with a 24 bit PNG with semi-transparent areas, saved for web out of Photoshop: - Original PNG: 858 KB - SWF output size, with JPEG quality for publishing set to 0 (zero): 177 KB - SWF output size, JPEG quality set to 100 (hundred): 627 KB The low quality version showed heavy artifacts and was, well ... low quality. I couldn't notice any differences in quality for the high quality version, despite the 200+ KB difference in filesize. Maybe this helps. Matthias _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
