If I change the TextRecord7's to TextRecord6's, do you think swfmill 0.3.0
will retain them?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Russ Adams <rad...@cafeid.com> wrote:

> Thanks Daniel, let me know. :-)
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Cassidy 
> <m...@danielcassidy.me.uk>wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/7 Daniel Cassidy <m...@danielcassidy.me.uk>:
>> > After a brief investigation it seems that swfmill 0.3.0 is expecting a
>> > TextRecord6, not a TextRecord7, but I’m not yet sure why. There has
>> > been a relevant change to the swfml format since swfmill 0.2.6, but it
>> > shouldn’t affect you since you’re targeting Flash Player 7. swfmill
>> > should be expecting a TextRecord7 and the current behaviour is
>> > definitely a bug.
>>
>> Oops, I just had another look and this is complete nonsense. I now
>> believe swfmill 0.3.0’s behaviour is correct and that this is not a
>> bug.
>>
>> Unfortunately I have to leave now but I will post again tomorrow with
>> an explanation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dan.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swfmill mailing list
>> swfmill@osflash.org
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Russ Adams
Software Engineer
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org

Reply via email to