Hi Chris
Groovy ? Grunge ? Same thing ;)
ALl fonts convert to the same format for me on my system - the one with
the navigation system for looking at the font letters with a scroll system.
I imagine that system s what it bigger filesize compared to yours.
I also imagine that the code for that scrolling system is AS1 or AS2 and
that is preventing it being AVM2
Any idea what the setting is for NOT having the presentation / scrolling
script ? I think that is the key
best
Jason
On 14/03/2011 12:46, Chris wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:05:22 +0400
Jason<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Chris
Thank you enormously for you efforts here.
When things don't add up, that's when it get interesting. ;o)
Am putting this back on the list
Good idea. Only took it off while passing file attachments.
My testing hasn't yet come up with anything that adds that mysterious
Unsigned Bit.
I'll confirm that later, if I am able.
Even with Groovy.ttf
The big difference I can see between your Groovy and mine is that when
played in the Flash Player, yours shows all the characters simply lined
up in several rows. Mine shows them larger, in one row, and has a
navigation system.
Groovy? You mean the grunge2 files? ;o) The obvious thing there is that
the default movie size is different. The conversion itself appears to
depend on what is best for the font, it's content, and layout.
I assume THAT is the where the bigger filesize comes in. But why your
system is compiling a completely different file to mine is a mystery.
The tests need to be consistent! Pretty random at the moment.
My Unix is a VPS, with no special installs (as I am incapable of that).
Depends on what you mean by special installs! I have SWFTools on both a
VPS ( though here again the inveterate meddler has struck ) and locally.
I have two copies of SWFTools. One standard 0.9.1 and one patched by
Ricardo.
0.9.1 and latest git here. ( You might wish to class a Ricardo patched
SWFtools, as a special install. ;o) )
Both the versions give the same (frustrating) result for me.
That's actually a good thing! At least there is some consistency between
versions.
Regards,
Chris.
